http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/may/17/all-light-we-cannot-see-review-anthony-doerr-pulitzer-prize
Sunday 17 May 2015
This is a sprawling 530-page novel, winner of this year’s Pulitzer prize for fiction,
about a girl and her father in Paris, and what befalls them when the
Nazi occupation of Paris drives them out. The girl, Marie-Laure, had
become blind by the age of six. Her father is a locksmith who works at
the Museum of Natural History. As his daughter’s sight finally fails,
her father builds her a model of Paris, and in this way she is able to
navigate around the city. The Jardin des Plantes is their favourite
place, and here Marie-Laure orients herself by counting drain covers and
trees and streets, memorising routes and recognising the scents of
trees and flowers.
In a parallel story, a young boy in Germany, Werner, an orphan, comes
to the notice of the Nazis for his astonishing skill at fixing radios,
and this leads to his relocation to an elite school aimed at providing
skills for the Reich. Little Werner proves his worth and survives, even
though the school is brutal and unrelenting.
When the Nazis arrive in Paris and begin to investigate the museum,
demanding keys from Marie’s father, he makes plans to move to his
uncle’s house in Saint-Malo. Despite her blindness, the girl is able to
visualise the layout of the town when her father makes a small and
detailed model of it. Months go by. Werner moves closer to the front as
the Germans favour experts who can pick up radio transmissions from the
allies. Life in Saint-Malo becomes increasingly difficult as the Germans
take full control. Marie-Laure’s father is investigated and taken away,
ending up in a German camp. Marie-Laure, virtually all alone with her
eccentric great uncle now, joins the resistance and carries messages in
baguettes.
Of course as you read the dual story, you wonder how soon it is
before Marie-Laure and Werner are going to meet. And it is a weakness of
this book that it has many aspects of genre fiction, despite the huge
amount of research that has gone into it. There is a worrying
even-handedness in Doerr’s treatment of the Germans and the French.
There are also some strange mistakes: for instance, Niels Bohr was not a
German. However, the story itself is gripping and it is easy to
understand why Doerr’s book is regarded by many as an epic and a
masterpiece.
No comments:
Post a Comment